Cleric could now push his nationalist agenda that has seen him pledge to curb foreign meddling
Iraqi Shi’ite cleric Muqtada Al Sadr attends to cast his vote at a polling station during the parliamentary election in Najaf, Iraq.
Baghdad: A surprise election victory for fiery Shiite cleric Muqtada Al Sadr seems to have shaken Iraq’s political landscape at the expense of both the Iranian and American influence in the country.
The populist Shiite preacher, a firebrand who once battled US troops and now opposes Tehran, has cobbled together a broad technocrat coalition tasked with rooting out Iraq’s endemic corruption.
But can he really sideline powerful foreign players and domestic rivals to take control?
Playing by the rules? –
While Al Sadr’s unlikely Marching Towards Reform alliance with Iraq’s communists looks on course to be the biggest group in parliament – it faces many obstacles.
The movement has pitched itself as a challenge to Iraq’s entrenched elite and ridden popular protests over graft to drum up support.
Under article 76 of Iraq’s constitution, the right to form a government falls to the political bloc with the most seats.
Al Sadr – who has ruled himself out of becoming PM – should be the key powerbroker and is already eyeing a coalition of around a dozen groups to reach a majority.
However, with months of wrangling expected ahead, it remains far from certain that he will get the chance to realise his ambitions.
At elections in 2010, the Iraqi National Movement of Ayad Allawi — loathed by Iran — scooped 91 seats to become the biggest group in parliament.
But after much manoeuvring, Allawi was eventually bested by Nouri Al Maliki, as Tehran helped engineer a union between two leading Shiite blocs to give him more seats.
Cutting foreign influence?
Strengthened by his apparent victory in Saturday’s polls, Al Sadr could now push his nationalist agenda that has seen him pledge to curb foreign meddling in Iraq.
After the 2003 invasion, his militia battled US forces. He is now calling for the latest deployment of American troops to leave following last year’s defeat of Daesh.
While his family of religious scholars historically has close ties with the Islamic revolutionaries in Iran and he spent years living there, Al Sadr has now fallen out with Tehran and wants its overbearing influence slashed.
In a sign that he is angling to chart a different course, he visited regional Sunni powerhouse Saudi Arabia last year.
Al Sadr faces a difficult act to herd together enough groups from across Iraq’s fragmented political spectrum to form a government.
He has extended a hand to a wide spread of parties, including the bloc of current Prime Minister Haider Al Abadi that lies in third place according to latest results.
Whether he can convince Al Abadi — a key member of the establishment Dawa party that has dominated Iraq for years — to turn his back on his former stablemates and team up remains a major question.
Al Abadi – who came to power in 2014 as Daesh rampaged across Iraq — has balanced off the US and Iran during his time at the helm.
Al Sadr for now appears to be ruling out an alliance with two other powerful forces inside Iraq: the Iran-backed Conquest Alliance of former anti-Daesh paramilitary fighters and ex-premier Al Maliki.
Any attempt to form a government that would threaten the influence Iran has built up in the 15 years since the fall of Saddam Hussain looks certain to face opposition from Tehran.
Iraq’s larger neighbour to the east has major leverage over many of the top Shiite politicians and it already seems like it may be looking to block Al Sadr’s path to power.
Political sources told AFP that two meetings have been held under Iranian guidance to bring together several political blocs.
According to a participant, the aim has been to unite Al Abadi and Al Maliki — bitter foes despite coming from the same Dawa party — alongside the Conquest Alliance, which looks set to come second in the election.
The initiative could trump Al Sadr’s own coalition-building efforts but it risks angering the cleric’s supporters who are yearning for a clampdown on corruption by establishment figures.